Skip to main content
Author(s):
Thomas A. Spies, Eric M. White, Alan A. Ager, Jeffrey D. Kline, John P. Bolte, Emily K. Platt, Keith A. Olsen, Robert J. Pabst, Ana M. G. Barros, John D. Bailey, Susan Charnley, Jennifer Koch, Michelle M. Steen-Adams, Peter H. Singleton, James Sulzman, Cynthia Schwartz, Blair Csuti
Year Published:

Cataloging Information

Topic(s):
Management Approaches
Recovery after fire

NRFSN number: 15133
Record updated:

Fire-prone landscapes present many challenges for both managers and policy makers in developing adaptive behaviors and institutions. We used a coupled human and natural systems framework and an agent-based landscape model to examine how alternative management scenarios affect fire and ecosystem services metrics in a fire-prone multiownership landscape in the eastern Cascades of Oregon. Our model incorporated existing models of vegetation succession and fire spread and information from original empirical studies of landowner decision making. Our findings indicate that alternative management strategies can have variable effects on landscape outcomes over 50 years for fire, socioeconomic, and ecosystem services metrics. For example, scenarios with federal restoration treatments had slightly less high-severity fire than a scenario without treatment; exposure of homes in the wildland-urban interface to fire was also slightly less with restoration treatments compared to no management. Treatments appeared to be more effective at reducing high-severity fire in years with more fire than in years with less fire. Under the current management scenario, timber production could be maintained for at least 50 years on federal lands. Under an accelerated restoration scenario, timber production fell because of a shortage of areas meeting current stand structure treatment targets. Trade-offs between restoration outcomes (e.g., open forests with large fire-resistant trees) and habitat for species that require dense older forests were evident. For example, the proportional area of nesting habitat for northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) was somewhat less after 50 years under the restoration scenarios than under no management. However, the amount of resilient older forest structure and habitat for white-headed woodpecker (Leuconotopicus albolarvatus) was higher after 50 years under active management. More carbon was stored on this landscape without management than with management, despite the occurrence of high-severity wildfire. Our results and further applications of the model could be used in collaborative settings to facilitate discussion and development of policies and practices for fire-prone landscapes.

Citation

Spies, T. A.; White, E.; Ager, A; Kline, J. D; Bolte, J. P.; Platt, E. K.; Olsen, K. A.; Pabst, R. J.; Barros, A. M.G.; Bailey, J. D.; Charnley, S.; Koch, J.; Steen-Adams, M. M.; Singleton, P. H.; Sulzman, J.; Schwartz, C.; Csuti, B. 2017. Using an agent-based model to examine forest management outcomes in a fire-prone landscape in Oregon, USA. Ecology and Society. 22(1): 25.

Access this Document