Skip to main content
Author(s):
Sébastien Lhardy, Emma Guillet-Descas, Guillaume Martinent
Year Published:
Compiler(s):
Editor(s):

Cataloging Information

Topic(s):
Crew Dynamics
Human Factors of Firefighter Safety
Human Performance
Psychological Safety
Wildland Firefighter Health
Ecosystem(s):

NRFSN number: 27791
FEIS number:
FRAMES RCS number:
TTRS number:
Record updated:

This study aimed to develop the Five Cognitive Biases in Risk-Taking Scale (5 CBR-S) to measure five cognitive biases associated with risk-taking: overconfidence, illusion of control, belief in the law of small numbers, escalation of commitment, and optimism. Firefighters completed a series of five questionnaires: cognitive biases related to risk-taking, emotional intelligence, self-regulation behaviors, personality traits, and mental toughness. Data were collected from two distinct samples, each consisting of 202 firefighters. A series of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses conducted on an initial version of the 5 CBR-S with 50 items provided structural evidence supporting a 5-factor, 19-item solution. Evidence of validity and reliability for the 5 CBR-S scores was provided by examining correlations with emotional intelligence, personality traits, and mental toughness. Overall, despite certain limitations, the 5 CBR-S constitutes a robust measure, offering the advantage of highlighting the five main cognitive biases related to risk-taking. It can be used both among firefighters and in other professional contexts involving high-intensity emergency decision-making.

Citation

Lhardy S, Guillet-Descas E, and Martinent G. 2025. Development of a Scale for Measuring Cognitive Biases Related to Risk-Taking Among Firefighters: The Five Cognitive Bias Risk Scale (5 CBR-S). Fire V8 I4 article147. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8040147

Access this Document

Treesearch

publication access with no paywall

Check to see if this document is available for free in the USDA Forest Service Treesearch collection of publications. The collection includes peer reviewed publications in scientific journals, books, conference proceedings, and reports produced by Forest Service employees, as well as science synthesis publications and other products from Forest Service Research Stations.