Skip to main content
Author(s):
Robert P. Gephart Jr.
Year Published:

Cataloging Information

Hot Topic(s):
Topic(s):
Fire Communication & Education
Crisis Communication
Human Dimensions of Fire Management
Decisionmaking & Sensemaking
Risk

NRFSN number: 16261
Record updated:

This article investigates responses to a gas pipeline explosion as a means of uncovering the methods that organizations and other participants use to make sense during disaster and to change situations. Sensemaking deals with how organizations and individuals explain or “make sense of” what goes on around them. Gephart is interested in how people use communication as a means of making sense of disasters. He finds that participants use communication to make sense of disaster situations in a number of ways, including conversations related to responsibility, risk, and safety; open avoidance of “blaming” participants and “allocating responsibility” to those who controlled events; and using common words and phrases found within the organization in order to explain the disaster. Looking at how people talk about disasters uncovers their values. For example, talk following the pipeline explosion centered around responsibility, risk, and safety, and it favored words and phrases commonly used in the organization. Understanding what people value allows managers to more effectively motivate them for change.

Citation

Gephart RP, Jr. The textual approach: risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal 36 (6), p. 1465-1514.

Access this Document

Treesearch

publication access with no paywall

Check to see if this document is available for free in the USDA Forest Service Treesearch collection of publications. The collection includes peer reviewed publications in scientific journals, books, conference proceedings, and reports produced by Forest Service employees, as well as science synthesis publications and other products from Forest Service Research Stations.