Skip to main content
Author(s):
Anthony S. Bova, William E. Mell, Chad M. Hoffman
Year Published:

Cataloging Information

Topic(s):
Fire Behavior
Simulation Modeling

NRFSN number: 13803
Record updated:

Simulating an advancing fire front may be achieved within a Lagrangian or Eulerian framework. In the former, independently moving markers are connected to form a fire front, whereas in the latter, values representing the moving front are calculated at points within a fixed grid. Despite a mathematical equivalence between the two methods, it is not clear that both will produce the same results when implemented numerically. Here, we describe simulations of fire spread created using a level set Eulerian approach (as implemented in the wildland–urban interface fire dynamics simulator, WFDS) and a marker method (as implemented in FARSITE). Simulations of surface fire spread, in two different fuels and over domains of increasing topographical complexity, are compared to evaluate the difference in outcomes between the two models. The differences between the results of the two models are minor, especially compared with the uncertainties inherent in the modelling of fire spread.

Citation

Bova, A.S.; Mell, W.E.; Hoffman, C.M. 2016. A comparison of level set and marker methods for the simulation of wildland fire front propagation. International Journal of Wildland Fire. Online early at http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF13178

Access this Document

Treesearch

publication access with no paywall

Check to see if this document is available for free in the USDA Forest Service Treesearch collection of publications. The collection includes peer reviewed publications in scientific journals, books, conference proceedings, and reports produced by Forest Service employees, as well as science synthesis publications and other products from Forest Service Research Stations.