Skip to main content
Author(s):
Clinton S. Wright
Year Published:

Cataloging Information

Topic(s):
Fire Behavior
Fire Prediction
Simulation Modeling
Fire Effects
Ecological - First Order
Fuel Consumption
Ecosystem(s):
Sagebrush steppe

NRFSN number: 11978
FRAMES RCS number: 14636
Record updated:

Fuel consumption predictions are necessary to accurately estimate or model fire effects, including pollutant emissions during wildland fires. Fuel and environmental measurements on a series of operational prescribed fires were used to develop empirical models for predicting fuel consumption in big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) ecosystems. Models are proposed for predicting fuel consumption during prescribed fires in the fall and the spring. Total prefire fuel loading ranged from 5.3-23.6 Mg*ha-1; between 32% and 92% of the total loading was composed of live and dead big sagebrush. Fuel consumption ranged from 0.8-22.3 Mg*ha-1, which equates to 11-99% of prefire loading (mean=59%). Model predictors include prefire shrub loading, proportion of area burned, and season of burn for shrub fuels (R^2=0.91). Models for predicting proportion of area burned for spring and fall fires were also developed (R^2=0.64 and 0.77 for spring and fall fire models, respectively). Proportion of area burned, an indicator of the patchiness of the fire, was best predicted from the coverage of the herbaceous vegetation layer, wind speed, and slope; for spring fires, day-of-burn 10-h woody fuel moisture content was also an important predictor variable. Models predicted independent shrub consumption measurements within 8.1% (fall) and 12.6% (spring) for sagebrush fires.

Citation

Wright, Clinton S. 2013. Models for predicting fuel consumption in sagebrush-dominated ecosystems. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 66(3): 254-266.

Access this Document

Treesearch

publication access with no paywall

Check to see if this document is available for free in the USDA Forest Service Treesearch collection of publications. The collection includes peer reviewed publications in scientific journals, books, conference proceedings, and reports produced by Forest Service employees, as well as science synthesis publications and other products from Forest Service Research Stations.